Over at the open-science mailing list at okfn.org, Michael Nielsen just posted a great “informal” definition of open science:
Open science is the idea that scientific knowledge of all kinds should be openly shared as early as is practical in the discovery process.
The discussion on the list has been very interesting, but that particular “informal” definition is great because it gets at why we’re struggling with established social norms in science given the new technological methods of communicating results:
…when the journal system was developed in the 17th and 18th centuries it was an excellent example of open science. The journals are perhaps the most open system for the dissemination of knowledge that can be constructed — if you’re working with 17th century technology. But, of course, today we can do a lot better.
Pingback: marjolein @studiolakmoes blog
Pingback: extreme science make-over « studio lakmoes . illustraties & infographics in Arnhem
Pingback: Open Science #ioe12 | Squire Morley
Pingback: Greenland State Change and Open Science | Planet3.0
Pingback: extreme science make-over « Studio Lakmoes | infographics & kennisverbeelding
Pingback: extreme science make-over « Studio Lakmoes
Pingback: Open science and the digital humanities | GC Digital Fellows
Pingback: eLabFTW as an Open Science tool to improve the quality and translation of preclinical research [version 2; peer review: 1 approved with reservations] - Open Access Articles
Pingback: eLabFTW as an Open Science tool to improve the quality and translation of preclinical research [version 2; peer review: 1 approved] - Open Access Articles