Set in Stone

Our brand new science building has a long hallway with clerestory windows and wonderful overlooks of the hallway from the labs on the upper floors. The terrazzo floor, however, needs some decoration, so each of the three departments involved in the project has been asked to design a four-foot octagonal medallion that will be set in the floor. The machine being used to do this is quite impressive; it can take vector graphics files and laser-cut those designs into the terrazzo. After the cutting procedure, terrazzo of other colors will be set into the cut-out sections.

So imagine yourself tasked with designing a floor medallion that succinctly describes your field, entices like-minded undergraduates to join your discipline, and most importantly – stands the test of time. These medallions are literally going to be set in stone, and we don’t want a scientific fad (or an actual error) made permanent. Here are the current designs:

The physicists have taken a set of fundamental equations in the hands of the original authors:

physics medallion

Around the top is a quote from Copernicus’ De revolutionibus which says in translation "And we can see that the sun is in the center". Around the bottom is Newton’s 3rd law, " For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction" (Actioni contrarium semper & æqualem esse reactionem) which was taken from lectures Newton deposited in Cambridge as part of his Lucasian professorship. The equations in the center of the medallion are:

  • Einstein’s famous energy-mass equivalence that was a direct consequence of his 1905 paper Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy-content?. This is one of the Annus Mirabilis papers that are celebrating their centenary this year.
  • Boltzmann‘s fundamental equivalence between available microstates of a system (W) and the Entropy (S) which has become the foundation of statistical mechanics. Boltzmann’s grave in the Zentralfriedhof in Vienna also displays this formula.
  • Another equation from Einstein. This one covers General Relativity, relating the curvature of spacetime (Left)
    to the Energy Density (stress-energy tensor) (right).
  • The Heisenberg uncertainty principle. I particularly love this equation because it shows a wonderful meta-uncertainty. Heisenberg replaces the equality with an approximate equality in the manuscript, and then in published work shows that the product of the variance in momentum and position is actually greater than or equal to a constant.

chemistry medallion
The chemists (and biochemists) start with the porphyrin ring system with a bound, but unspecified metal atom. This chemical motif can be found in chlorophyll (with a reduced pyrrole unit and a bound Magnesium atom in the M position) as well as in heme (with a bound iron in the M position). This is an organic molecule (which makes my organic colleagues happy), with a bound metal (which makes the inorganic chemists happy), and is a fundamental structure in two biochemical processes (which makes the biochemists happy). The other three groups have tried to mollify the physical chemists with two equations: one defining the Gibbs free energy, and one relating free energy changes to the equilibrium constant. Personally, I would have preferred the UV-Vis spectrum of porphyrin as the representative contribution of physical chemistry.

The quote along the top is the beginning of Kekulé‘s description of his dream about the benzene structure:

…I was sitting writing on my textbook, but the work did not progress; my thoughts were elsewhere. I turned my chair to the fire and dozed. Again the atoms were gamboling before my eyes. This time the smaller groups kept modestly in the background. My mental eye, rendered more acute by the repeated visions of the kind, could now distinguish larger structures of manifold conformation; long rows sometimes more closely fitted together all twining and twisting in snake-like motion. But look! What was that? One of the snakes had seized hold of its own tail, and the form whirled mockingly before my eyes. As if by a flash of lightning I awoke; and this time also I spent the rest of the night in working out the consequences of the hypothesis.

biology medallion
The biologists had an easier time picking a single image to summarize their field. The DNA double helix is so important in biology that it had to be the central image. The two quotes they chose are wonderful, however:

  • "All life is an experiment" from a journal entry (November 11, 1842) by Ralph Waldo Emerson
  • "Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution." which was the title of a talk delivered by Theodosius Dobzhansky at the 1972 meeting of the American Association of Biology Teachers.

Well, there you have it. This is what three argumentative groups of scientists want set in stone about our three fields, and as a corollary, what we want our students walking all over with snow- and mud-covered boots. Although the chemistry medallion feels like it was designed by committee (which it was), chemists belong to a very broad field that barely speaks the same language from one side to another. I’m amazed we could come to agreement on any design.

[tags]science, floors[/tags]

Share
Posted in Fun, Science | 3 Comments

Closed-source Apples?

One of our favorite new food finds is the wonderfully genetically-engineered variety of apple called the honeycrisp. Honeycrisps are crisp, sweet, slightly acidic, and very aromatic. They are about as close as you can come to a perfect apple, and priced ($2.50 / lb.) to match.

But, it turns out that the variety has been patented by the University of Minnesota

Darn. I like my Apples to be Open Source

[tags]apples, open source[/tags]

Share
Posted in Fun | Leave a comment

Table of Condiments that Periodically Go Bad

More periodic table silliness: The Table of Condiments That Periodically Go Bad.

Share
Posted in Fun | Leave a comment

Periodic Tales from the BBC

schematic periodic table The BBC is doing a wonderful radio series on the periodic table called Periodic Tales. So far only ten elements have been profiled (He, Ag, Co, Se, O, As, Hg, I, Ni), but it looks like a great way to get excited about the elements.

(Found via Cosmic Variance).

[tags]periodic table, chemistry[/tags]

Share
Posted in Fun, Science | Leave a comment

Thoughtful cardinals, ID-iots in the Indiana Legislature

Two news items of some concern to those of us teaching science at Notre Dame:

First, some depressing news from the Indy Star: GOP lawmakers want schools to teach ‘intelligent design’. And Hoosiers are off on a race to the bottom with the fine people of Kansas.

But Cardinal Paul Poupard has been saying reasonable things about religion risking fundamentalism if it ignores science.

So some bad news, some good. At least we can sound off about idiotic curriculum proposals in the Indy Star forum.

[tags]creationism, indiana[/tags]

Share
Posted in Policy | 1 Comment

Blog Blinking Statistics

After spending last week fighting with commercial software and then re-writing an entire computational lab around bugs in said software, I noticed something odd about my blog posting: My blinking statistics are starting to look like they have a power law distribution.

blog waiting time distribution Imagine that someone posts every weekday morning to their blog. That person would have an interesting distribution of “waiting times” between blog posts. There’d be a cluster of waiting times at the 1 day mark, and then a much smaller cluster at the 3 day mark. Since no one posts at exactly the same time every day, there’d be spread around those times, and a plot like the one to the right might describe well the blogger’s waiting time distribution (or their “blinking statistics”). For those of you with some statistics background, I’ve assumed in this plot that the waiting times for your average blogger would follow a Gamma distribution.

We all know what happens when a blogger is on a roll or when there’s been a big news day; posts come out rapidly, and the waiting time distribution suddenly gets a lot of contributions at the short time end. But what happens when real life intervenes? That is, what happens when a blogger’s regular job makes long-term demands, or when someone has a child, or when someone has to spend a week rewriting a computer lab around bugs in some annoying commercial software… An extreme case of this would be when a blogger suddenly leaves the internet (or passes away). Suddenly the waiting time distribution gets a very long tail.

Clay Shirky has written about power law distributions of inbound blog links, Jason Kottke worked with data from technorati and shown that for the top 100 blogs, a power law distribution of links is a reasonable assumption, and I’ve mentioned it when discussing asymmetric networks.

I don’t know if anyone has ever looked at the waiting time distribution for blog posts before. I’d be curious if the blogosphere has Lévy statistics or a Pareto distribution. We may not have the dynamic range to tell yet. Blogs have only been around for a few years, and seeing a difference between the long-tail distributions can take many decades of decay.

[tags]statistics, waiting times[/tags]

Share
Posted in Meta, Science | Leave a comment

Richard Smalley R.I.P.

Nobel Laureate and Rice University professor Richard Smalley has died at the age of 62. Smalley is best known for his discovery of buckyballs. He’s also known for his contribution to this now-famous Chemical & Engineering News nanotechnology debate with Eric Drexler. I’ve shown my physical chemistry students that debate. It isn’t the most civil thing they’ll see in science, but it lays out some of the fundamental problems good scientists like Smalley have had with the pie-in-the-sky nanotechnology futurists.

[tags]nanotechnology, science[/tags]

Share
Posted in Science | Leave a comment

The Worst Jobs in Science

Do you have one of The Worst Jobs in Science? Popular science has ranked them this year. Here’s the list:

  • Orangutan-Pee collector
  • NASA Ballerina
  • Do-Gooder
  • Semen Washer
  • Volcanologist
  • Nuclear-Weapons Scientist
  • Extremophile Excavator
  • Kansas Biology Teacher
  • Manure Inspector
  • Human Lab Rat

Perhaps it is just me, but I think that “Kansas Biology Teacher” is redundant because they have duties somewhere between “Manure Inspector” and “Do-Gooder”.

Perhaps next year “theoretical chemist” will make the list.

[tags]science, dirty jobs[/tags]

Share
Posted in Fun, Science | Leave a comment

Literature-Based Generation of Hypotheses…

I’m not entirely sure what this article is about, but the start of the title sounds very intriguing. There are times when I think that some paper I’ve just reviewed was written by a perl script, using text cut-and-pasted (or only slightly permuted) from the PI’s previous work. In fact, that would be a relatively fun project: use google scholar to find a molecule at random from the literature. You could then automate a set of electronic structure calculations on this molecule for a wide selection of basis sets and levels of theory, automatically tabulate the energy data or some incorrect solvation free energies, and then automatically generate the paper.

(It should be obvious that I’m not serious. I work on methods development and not applications. Applications-only papers come out 10 times as fast as methods papers, and this fact tends to annoy methods people.)

Literature-based Generation of Hypotheses. Otherwise known as getting an idea in journal club.

Share
Posted in Science | Leave a comment

Online Unit Converter

We just found UnitConversion.org, an online unit converter with auto-complete and a pretty large database of odd units. It looks like a a great tool, although it is inexplicably lacking the Debye (which we were trying to convert to electron Angstroms).

My favorite scientific unit has always been the barn (1 barn = 10-24 cm2), which is a unit of cross-sectional area. I.e. hitting this nucleus should be as easy as hitting the side of a barn… Quadrupole moments can be expressed as electron-barns, and our group code uses this unit internally just because it amuses us.

It is interesting to note the following conversions:

  • 1 barn = 1.072505996 x 10-36 township
  • 1 barn = 1.544408634 x 10-34 homestead
  • 1 barn = 2.471053815 x 10-32 acre

Apparently, physicists have very small farms.

[tags]units[/tags]

Share
Posted in Fun, Science | 4 Comments