Don’t dumb me down

There’s a wonderful Bad Science column by Ben Goldacre in the Guardian all about media coverage of science and why media reports on science are uniformly horrible. Here’s an excerpt:

Science stories usually fall into three families: wacky stories, scare stories and “breakthrough” stories.

Goldacre provides a nearly complete taxonomy of the types of mass media reports on science that you are likely to find. There’s this mini-rant which should be framed and handed out to any scientist who is talking to a journalist:

Last month there was an interesting essay in the journal PLoS Medicine, about how most brand new research findings will turn out to be false. It predictably generated a small flurry of ecstatic pieces from humanities graduates in the media, along the lines of science is made-up, self-aggrandising, hegemony-maintaining, transient fad nonsense; and this is the perfect example of the parody hypothesis that we’ll see later. Scientists know how to read a paper. That’s what they do for a living: read papers, pick them apart, pull out what’s good and bad.

Scientists never said that tenuous small new findings were important headline news – journalists did.

There’s too much good stuff in the column to excerpt any more. Go read the whole thing!

Update: I just found out that Goldacre has his own blog at badscience.net where he’s posted the article with space for reader coments.

No votes yet.
Please wait...
Share
This entry was posted in Fun, Policy, Science. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Don’t dumb me down

  1. martin g says:

    Wonderful piece . . .

    I’ve tried, but I couldn’t put it better myself.

    Readers might like to have a look at my tongue-in-cheek science tech mag

    http://www.ohupurleese.com

    where I take apart ironic science items on a daily basis . . .

    No votes yet.
    Please wait...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.